![]() But how cheaper is it as compared to the i20 DCT? Let's try to find that out. Launched yesterday, Altroz DCA is the cheapest car in the country with the option of a DCT gearbox. ![]() Running on the EcoShift technology, a dual-clutch. Until a few years ago, DCT gearboxes were not available with mass-oriented vehicles (except for a few options like VW Polo, Skoda Rapid, etc.) but that has changed now with options like Hyundai i20 DCT and the recently launched Tata Altroz DCA. You can also upgrade to the optional SHIFTRONIC automatic transmission system that includes six gear speeds. With slick gearshifts and a smooth ride, dual-clutch automatic gearboxes are well suited for spirited drivers. The Evo MR or Lancer Ralliart with SST is another. This is where the dual-clutch transmission (DCT) comes into place. Ive found the VW GTI with DSG (dual clutch) is probably the cheapest car with one (I found an 07 for 15k). However, the AMT unit isn't the appropriate gearbox option for drivers looking for engaging performance and quick gearshifts. This has been largely due to the availability of cost-effective AMT units and even CVT units that have encouraged people from shifting to automatic cars. The 2010 was the first year of the CVT in the Legacy/Outback.The demand for cars with automatic transmission in the country has been on a rise over the last few years in the wake of increasing traffic. ![]() I'm interested to see how much better the 2018's CVT is, because I've heard they've only gotten better. The CVT isn't the bees knees, but it's a heck of a lot better than where it came from. The gear spacing is too big, the locking/unlocking of the converter is not seamless, and it just constantly reminds you that it was first introduced in the 1990s. Most appliance automatics are pretty slow to respond when calling for passing power these days (because again, trying to maximize economy) but it's not limited to automatics - you can tell the throttle programming in our 2013 Mazda3 - Skyactiv, 6MT - is biased towards economy because it sometimes feels like some of the 155 horses only have 2 legs.īack to Subies, I'll say again that the 2002 Outback's 4EAT is leagues behind the 2010's CVT in pretty much all respects. Not sure what kind of hesitation you're talking about. I have driven the 2010 and yes there's a slight hesitation going between drive modes and it wants to maximize fuel economy by staying in a lower gear. I haven't yet had a chance to drive my FIL's new 2018 Outback. The Ford unit just plain sucks - they should have kept a torque converter automatic with early lockup, like the Mazda Skyactiv design.ĭid Subie CVT's improve? The slowly- responding trans in our ’15 Forester XT is the most irritating thing about the car. ![]() Most of the failures you see these days are due to lack of care, rather than design. It's a pretty ironed-out design by this point.ġ0 years ago I would have said no way to a DSG because of reliability concerns, but it's been proven. There were a slew of mechatronics failures, but VW extended the coverage on those and most of the affected units should be taken care of by now. I've seen stock DSG's that are hitched to tuned motors last 150k or so on the clutches because the owners were diligent about maintenance. But there are so many tools available for the DIY'er, and indy shops can turn them over efficiently, that it's not a particularly cost-prohibitive($200 or so) or difficult service to perform. The downside of the wet clutch in the DSG is that fluid changes are required every 40,000 miles or so. To add insult to injury, it's also not typically available in a package that's conducive to spirited driving. That is the main reason why the slow speed performance is so poor, and clutch life is so bad on the Ford. One of the major reasons why the VW DSG is far superior to the Ford DCT, is that the VW is a wet clutch design, similar to a motorcycle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |